ResidualPlaybeta Open the radar

Soulstice

Reply Game Studios · 2022 · $39.99 · Action · deal grade A

Measured on 2026-09-23 13:33 UTC, 12 days ago. The whole catalog is re-measured daily; a game that just launched can move fast between passes.

  • Estimated net residual revenue: $2.6k to $3.9k per month
  • Opportunity: $5.2k per month at x1.60 dormancy
  • Estimated lifetime owners: 73.8k
  • 73% positive across 2810 reviews · 13.1 reviews/month

Why it's flagged

  • Developer silent for 3.3 years
  • Studio inactive: no public activity across 1 tracked titles
  • Last discounted 1 months ago, 12 sales in the last 12 months
  • Proven demand elasticity: x1.5 review velocity during past deep sales

Analyst notes (AI-assisted)

Note written 2026-08-30; the live figures above take precedence over any numbers in it.

Soulstice is a 2022 action game from Reply Game Studios featuring stylish combat, narrative-driven storytelling, and a dormant studio that has not posted since launch.

Soulstice accumulated solid lifetime residuals and maintains modest monthly inflow despite zero promotional activity in 12 months. The core tension is execution: players praise art direction and story but fault camera-control coupling, character responsiveness, and technical polish. The studio is inactive, making acquisition of the IP and backlog catalog attractive for revival-focused publishers or a team willing to patch pain points and relaunch. A mid-sized owner base with 50% still-engaged players suggests untapped potential if friction is addressed. Most realistic play: revival.

  • Risk: Camera-to-control responsiveness is cited as the primary obstacle to player enjoyment; fixing proprietary systems requires either the original codebase and tooling or substantial reverse-engineering.
  • Risk: Developer studio is inactive as of the case file snapshot, meaning no live support, patches, or IP guidance; revival rights and engine access must be negotiated or reclaimed.
  • Risk: Action genre is crowded; the game's 73% positive rating and niche appeal suggest it will not naturally reacquire mainstream visibility without targeted marketing and mechanical fixes.

This case as Markdown · Estimates carry ±30-50% error per title.