ResidualPlaybeta Open the radar

Knights and Merchants

Topware Interactive · 2013 · $9.99 · Simulation · deal grade B

Measured on 2026-10-02 01:58 UTC, 4 days ago. The whole catalog is re-measured daily; a game that just launched can move fast between passes.

  • Estimated net residual revenue: $242 to $363 per month
  • Opportunity: $484 per month at x1.60 dormancy
  • Estimated lifetime owners: 210.0k
  • 85% positive across 4966 reviews · 5.6 reviews/month

Why it's flagged

  • Developer silent for 7.9 years
  • Studio inactive: no public activity across 1 tracked titles
  • 44% of reviews come from key activations (excluded from revenue estimates)
  • Last discounted 0 months ago, 10 sales in the last 12 months

Analyst notes (AI-assisted)

Note written 2026-09-14; the live figures above take precedence over any numbers in it.

A 1998 medieval RTS remaster published as a 2013 remake, focused on settlement building and resource management in a distinctly retro strategy style.

Knights and Merchants maintains solid residual monthly revenue with a devoted but small core audience; the game carries no active developer support (94 months since last dev communication) and sits in a quiet state. For a publisher seeking catalog depth in the strategy/simulation space, the IP represents a known brand in the classic-RTS revival segment with acceptable retention metrics (85% positive sentiment, 60% still-playing rate). However, the title requires realistic expectations: it is a low-volume, long-tail earner with no ongoing marketing or live ops, and Topware's studio status makes future support or cross-promotion unlikely without new ownership. Most realistic play: publishing.

  • Risk: Developer (Topware Interactive) studio status is inactive; no post-release support or patches expected from original author.
  • Risk: No cloud save, no Steam achievements, and no workshop support limit modern player onboarding and engagement mechanics.
  • Risk: Median playtime of 21.6 hours suggests a steep completion wall; new players may churn before reaching deeper content.
  • Risk: Localization gap of 18% and weak Brazilian Portuguese presence (top unmet language) despite solid review volume in that market hints at untapped regional demand.

This case as Markdown · Estimates carry ±30-50% error per title.