ResidualPlaybeta Open the radar

Nuclear Design Bureau

Design Bureau KB-11 · 2026 · $9.99 · Indie · deal grade A

Measured on 2026-09-16 16:18 UTC. The whole catalog is re-measured daily; a game that just launched can move fast between passes.

  • Estimated net residual revenue: $3.2k to $4.8k per month
  • Opportunity: $5.1k per month at x1.30 dormancy
  • Estimated lifetime owners: 2.0k
  • 89% positive across 54 reviews · 47.2 reviews/month

Why it's flagged

  • Developer active, last post 0 months ago
  • Last build shipped 0 months ago
  • Store page localized in only 1 language(s)

Analyst notes (AI-assisted)

Note written 2026-09-17; the live figures above take precedence over any numbers in it.

Nuclear Design Bureau is an early-access physics sandbox where players design and test nuclear weapons through hydrodynamic simulation.

This is a specialized engineering sim with genuine technical depth, launched mere weeks ago to an engaged niche audience with strong retention signals (88% positive, 100% still-playing rate). The title shows solid monthly residuals despite zero promotional discounting, suggesting organic word-of-mouth momentum. Opportunity exists for a patient publisher or simulator-genre specialist to support the dev through early-access maturation; the core simulation is sound but UI/performance polish and localization gaps (8% loc_gap toward Simplified Chinese) remain critical friction points before mainstream viability. Most realistic play: publishing.

  • Risk: Hydrodynamic simulation performance is CPU-bound and slow on non-GPU systems; multiple players report detonation viewer lag and sim delays, which may limit addressable audience and require substantial engine optimization.
  • Risk: Extremely niche subject matter attracts a self-selecting audience of physics enthusiasts and simulation fans; mainstream appeal is inherently capped, and player acquisition beyond organic channels will be costly.
  • Risk: Heavy reliance on AI-generated copy and art is a documented community flashpoint; several high-visibility negative reviews cite AI content as a dealbreaker, risking brand perception and review sentiment erosion if not addressed.

This case as Markdown · Estimates carry ±30-50% error per title.